FIA Governance Overhaul Sparks Controversy

Controversial changes to the statutes of Formula 1's governing body, the FIA, have been passed by members despite warnings of a 'dark period of democratic backsliding.' The amendments, proposed by FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, were approved with an 83.35% majority, while changes to the ethics code passed with an 88.83% majority.

Opposition and Criticism

Austria's national motoring club, the OAMTC, criticized the changes in a letter to the FIA World Council for Automobile Mobility and Tourism (WCAMT). The letter denounced Ben Sulayem's leadership and urged members not to vote for the amendments, citing risks to the FIA's reputation for competent and transparent governance.

Legal and Governance Concerns

The OAMTC letter hinted at the prospect of a legal challenge, arguing that the changes were endorsed by improperly constituted world council meetings. The letter also highlighted several concerns:

• Extended deadlines for candidates: Intended to discourage opposition.
• Removal of nationality requirements: Aimed at stacking the WMSC with supporters.
• Alignment of committee terms with the president: Reducing the independence of oversight bodies.
• Centralization of decision-making: Weakening the senate's oversight functions.

Ben Sulayem's Leadership

Ben Sulayem's first term ends this December, and he is currently the only confirmed candidate for re-election. The letter accused him of reneging on his 2021 campaign promises to ensure governance structures comply with best practices. It also noted that none of the critical changes recommended by a 2022 McKinsey audit have been implemented.

FIA's Response

An FIA spokesperson described the vote as a 'resounding majority' and stated that the amendments aim to strengthen governance and confidentiality. The spokesperson emphasized that all proposed amendments were voted through by a super majority of FIA member clubs, in line with the democratic process.

Conclusion

Despite the controversy, the FIA has moved forward with its governance overhaul. The changes have sparked significant debate about the future of transparency and accountability within the organization, as it continues to navigate the complexities of modern motorsport governance.